i9-9990XE vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
19.34
+1.8%
Core i9-9990XE
2019
14 cores / 28 threads, 255 Watt
18.99

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i9-9990XE by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking301311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.462.94
Market segmentDesktop processorWorkstation
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Core i9
Power efficiency7.327.05
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date6 August 2018 (6 years ago)3 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,299$2,800

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 120% better value for money than i9-9990XE.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads4828
Base clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3040
L1 cache2.25 MB896 KB
L2 cache12 MB14 MB
L3 cache64 MB19.25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket TR42066
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt255 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 19.34
+1.8%
i9-9990XE 18.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 30718
+1.8%
i9-9990XE 30162

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.34 18.99
Recency 6 August 2018 3 January 2019
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 48 28
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 255 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2% lower power consumption.

i9-9990XE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a desktop processor while Core i9-9990XE is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Core i9-9990XE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Intel Core i9-9990XE
Core i9-9990XE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 37 votes

Rate Core i9-9990XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX or Core i9-9990XE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.