EPYC 7453 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.63
EPYC 7453
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 225 Watt
33.05
+98.7%

EPYC 7453 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking410126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.9617.18
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.4213.39
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date3 October 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649$1,570

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7453 has 72% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads2456
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.45 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3527.5
L1 cache96K (per core)1792 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)14 MB
L3 cache32 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm+
Die size213 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.63
EPYC 7453 33.05
+98.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25444
EPYC 7453 50575
+98.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.63 33.05
Recency 3 October 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 28
Threads 24 56
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 25% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7453, on the other hand, has a 98.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7453 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7453 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and EPYC 7453, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 71 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or EPYC 7453, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.