Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Ryzen Threadripper 1998X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiencyno data27.86
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release dateno data30 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threadsno data14
Base clock speedno data2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache32768 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Number of transistorsno data92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)0 Watt78 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

Ryzen Threadripper 1998X has 14.3% more physical cores.

Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and M3 Max 14-Core. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1998X is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1998X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 67 votes

Rate M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1998X or M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.