Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Ryzen Threadripper 1998X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 222 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.94 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 14 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP3r2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 0 Watt | 78 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Ryzen Threadripper 1998X has 14.3% more physical cores.
Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1998X is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1998X and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
