Athlon MP 2600+ vs Ryzen Threadripper 1956

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Barton (2001−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)6 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$273

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Boost clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache32768 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2A
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt47 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 47 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1956 has 1100% more physical cores, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 2600+, on the other hand, has 166% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1956 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2600+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1956 and Athlon MP 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1956
Ryzen Threadripper 1956
AMD Athlon MP 2600+
Athlon MP 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1956 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon MP 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1956 or Athlon MP 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.