Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
17.43
+6%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.45

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking365404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.062.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency9.1610.74
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 118% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads3244
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3424
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million7,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1.5 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 17.43
+6%
Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 27681
+5.9%
Xeon E5-2699A v4 26129

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 1186
+0.8%
Xeon E5-2699A v4 1177

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 8034
Xeon E5-2699A v4 9546
+18.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.43 16.45
Recency 13 July 2017 25 October 2016
Physical cores 16 22
Threads 32 44
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 145 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has 37.5% more physical cores and 37.5% more threads, and 24.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 156 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 53 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.