Pentium 4 1.80 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017, $999
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
15.59
+22171%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Pentium 4 1.80 by a whopping 22171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5023685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.75no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency9.290.11
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Willamette (2000−2001)
Release date10 August 2017 (8 years ago)August 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads321
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)8 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB
L3 cache32 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm180 nm
Die size213 mm2217 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors9,600 million42 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2478
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt67 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR1, DDR2
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 15.59
+22171%
Pentium 4 1.80 0.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 27474
+23790%
Samples: 1607
Pentium 4 1.80 115
Samples: 40

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.59 0.07
Physical cores 16 1
Threads 32 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 67 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a 22171.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 1.80, on the other hand, has 168.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 1.80 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Intel Pentium 4 1.80
Pentium 4 1.80

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 168 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 295 votes

Rate Pentium 4 1.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Pentium 4 1.80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.