Xeon E-2236 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 859 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 37.93 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon E |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.46 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $284 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 154 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP3r2 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | N/A |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | N/A |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | N/A |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | N/A |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | N/A |
| OpenGL | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 29 May 2019 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 6 |
| Threads | 28 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 80 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
Xeon E-2236, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 125% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2236 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Xeon E-2236, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
