Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.53
+4.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
13.90

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking489527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.647.31
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date10 August 2017 (7 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 14.53
+4.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 13.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23088
+4.6%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 22077

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.53 13.90
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 382 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or Ryzen Threadripper 1950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.