Xeon E5-2650 v3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
10.58
+42.4%
Xeon E5-2650 v3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
7.43

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking731972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency8.016.70
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date31 August 2017 (7 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s9.6 GT/s
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size213 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistors9,600 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSP3r2FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size2 TiB768 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.58
+42.4%
Xeon E5-2650 v3 7.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809
+42.5%
Xeon E5-2650 v3 11797

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 1186
+32.7%
Xeon E5-2650 v3 894

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 5896
+9.1%
Xeon E5-2650 v3 5404

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.58 7.43
Recency 31 August 2017 8 September 2014
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2650 v3, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 19% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v3 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2650 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2650 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
Xeon E5-2650 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Xeon E5-2650 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.