EPYC 7281 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
10.58
EPYC 7281
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
13.61
+28.6%

EPYC 7281 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking730542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.734.62
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.567.58
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date31 August 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$650

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7281 has 24% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3821
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors9,600 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3r2TR4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes60128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.58
EPYC 7281 13.61
+28.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809
EPYC 7281 21621
+28.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.58 13.61
Recency 31 August 2017 29 June 2017
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 170 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has an age advantage of 2 months, and 36% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7281, on the other hand, has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7281 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7281 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and EPYC 7281, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
AMD EPYC 7281
EPYC 7281

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7281 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or EPYC 7281, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.