EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking599not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency26.75no data
Architecture codenameRembrandt (2022)Turin (2024)
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP7SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2022 10 October 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9015, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and EPYC 9015, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
AMD EPYC 9015
EPYC 9015

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded V3C48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9015 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V3C48 or EPYC 9015, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.