EPYC Embedded 3151 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1717 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 9.84 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 25 February 2020 (4 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 26 | 27 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.8 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 February 2020 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1606G has an age advantage of 2 years, and 80% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3151, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3151 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1606G and EPYC Embedded 3151, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
