Ryzen 5 8400F vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.16
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.39
+613%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1600 by a whopping 613% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1864462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.75
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.0221.99
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date25 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.8 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded R1600 2.16
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.39
+613%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded R1600 3365
Ryzen 5 8400F 23983
+613%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 15.39
Recency 25 February 2020 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Embedded R1600 has 160% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, has a 612.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Embedded R1600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 33 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 208 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded R1600 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.