FX-7600P vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded R1505G outperforms FX-7600P by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1729 | 2031 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | AMD Kaveri |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| Release date | 16 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | BGA (FP3) |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 209.8 mm2 | 245 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | 2,410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| HSA | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.49 | 1.69 |
| Recency | 16 April 2019 | 4 June 2014 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1505G has a 47.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
FX-7600P, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
The Ryzen Embedded R1505G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7600P in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded R1505G and FX-7600P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
