FX-6300 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
21.46
+695%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 695% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2591709
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.55
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency36.242.59
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$132

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads246
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data288 KB
L2 cache12 MB6144 KB
L3 cache24 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890MOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 21.46
+695%
FX-6300 2.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 32843
+694%
FX-6300 4137

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.46 2.70
Recency 25 July 2024 23 October 2012
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 6
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 694.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 75.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4036 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.