Apple M2 Pro vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+43.3%
Apple M2 Pro
2023
12 cores / 12 threads
13.73

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Apple M2 Pro by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking291544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency34.47no data
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)no data
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 cache12 MB36 MB
L3 cache24 MB24 MB
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data40000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)54 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+43.3%
Apple M2 Pro 13.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+43.4%
Apple M2 Pro 21802

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+61.1%
Apple M2 Pro 2069

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+30.9%
Apple M2 Pro 230

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 14728
Apple M2 Pro 15010
+1.9%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 348
Apple M2 Pro 386
+10.9%

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 1720
Apple M2 Pro 1805
+4.9%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 277
+9.5%
Apple M2 Pro 253

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 15220
+4.5%
Apple M2 Pro 14568

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 2867
+7.7%
Apple M2 Pro 2663

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 13.73
Recency 25 July 2024 17 January 2023
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 43.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the M2 Pro in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 182 votes

Rate M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.