3020e vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+1186%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms 3020e by a whopping 1186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2912137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency34.4724.12
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache12 MB1 MB
L3 cache24 MB4 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP8FT5
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+1186%
3020e 1.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+1185%
3020e 2433

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 3334
+1601%
3020e 196

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 301
+227%
3020e 92

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 14728
+1140%
3020e 1188

Blender(-)

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 159
3020e 2964
+1764%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 2121
+232%
3020e 638

7-Zip Single

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 5856
+125%
3020e 2597

7-Zip

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 77867
+1469%
3020e 4963

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 348
+231%
3020e 105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 1.53
Integrated graphics card 21.89 2.98
Recency 25 July 2024 4 August 2020
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1186.3% higher aggregate performance score, 634.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

3020e, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.