EPYC 7373X vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking286not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency28.96no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket AM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 240 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has 269.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 52 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.