Celeron N6211 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
19.90
+1311%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 1311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2802198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency28.9720.53
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache64 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 19.90
+1311%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 31616
+1308%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.90 1.41
Recency 30 September 2019 17 July 2022
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has a 1311.3% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 52 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.