EPYC 9634 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900X
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
24.61
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
67.96
+176%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900X by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.212.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency22.1822.18
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date5 November 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900X has 1427% better value for money than EPYC 9634.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)84
Threads24168
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3722.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD)12x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors0 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900X 24.61
EPYC 9634 67.96
+176%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900X 39094
EPYC 9634 107944
+176%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.61 67.96
Recency 5 November 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 12 84
Threads 24 168
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 290 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900X has 176.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 176.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900X and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3780 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900X or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.