EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.60
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.18
+137%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking553126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)no data
Power efficiency36.7525.36
Architecture codenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.6 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm
Die size180 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.60
EPYC 4484PX 32.18
+137%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 5900HS 21607
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+137%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.60 32.18
Integrated graphics card 9.05 1.98
Recency 12 January 2021 21 May 2024
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900HS has 357.1% faster integrated GPU, and 242.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 136.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 5900HS is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 5900HS and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 5900HS or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.