EPYC 9275F vs Ryzen 9 3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.98no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)no data
Power efficiency28.23no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date24 September 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$3,439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Die size2x 74 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors7,600 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900 has 392.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 623 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900 or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.