EPYC 7413 vs Ryzen 9 3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
19.92

EPYC 7413 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking274119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.84
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date9 October 2019 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data26.5
L1 cache768 KB1536 KB
L2 cache6 MB12 MB
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die size2x 74 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors7,600 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4 (1331)SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900 19.92
EPYC 7413 32.47
+63%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900 30818
EPYC 7413 50223
+63%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900 1677
+9%
EPYC 7413 1538

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900 9582
EPYC 7413 12804
+33.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.92 32.47
Recency 9 October 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3900 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 596 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900 or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.