Celeron N3050 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+4449%
Celeron N3050
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.37

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Celeron N3050 by a whopping 4449% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3923042
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency45.515.84
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache16 MB0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP8FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+4449%
Celeron N3050 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730
+4446%
Celeron N3050 588

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228
+1319%
Celeron N3050 157

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627
+3764%
Celeron N3050 275

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+1088%
Celeron N3050 1243

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+3804%
Celeron N3050 63

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+691%
Celeron N3050 34

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.83 0.37
Integrated graphics card 18.32 0.77
Recency 13 June 2023 1 April 2015
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 4448.6% higher aggregate performance score, 2279.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N3050, on the other hand, has 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3050 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron N3050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 552 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Celeron N3050, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.