E2-3200 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
9.81
+1508%
E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.61

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X outperforms E2-3200 by a whopping 1508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7892800
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency9.770.89
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache768 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FM1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Radeon HD 6370D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X 9.81
+1508%
E2-3200 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X 15579
+1509%
E2-3200 968

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X 1076
+261%
E2-3200 298

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X 5355
+920%
E2-3200 525

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.81 0.61
Recency 29 June 2017 7 September 2011
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has a 1508.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

E2-3200, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is a server/workstation processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 218 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.