Celeron 787 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking823not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency13.47no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3013
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-950 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVO-+
CRT-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 1 July 2011
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 787, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 787 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron 787, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 99 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 or Celeron 787, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.