Xeon E5-2683 v4 vs Ryzen 7 7840S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.90
+36.9%
Xeon E5-2683 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
10.88

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v4 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking489755
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.73
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency40.548.63
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date5 January 2023 (2 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,846

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB4 MB
L3 cache16 MB40 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C84 °C
Number of transistorsno data7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 7 7840S 14.90
+36.9%
Xeon E5-2683 v4 10.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 23908
+36.9%
Xeon E5-2683 v4 17458

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.90 10.88
Recency 5 January 2023 20 June 2016
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 120 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840S has a 36.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 242.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2683 v4, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2683 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2683 v4 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
Xeon E5-2683 v4

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 584 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2683 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2683 v4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.