Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 7 7840S

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.30
+12.3%
Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.63

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking452540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency41.3736.85
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm7 nm
Die size178 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.30
+12.3%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 24309
+12.3%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 21645

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7840S 7579
+18.8%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 6380

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7840S 45931
+11.4%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 41235

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7840S 29
+14.7%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 25

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7840S 2223
+8.9%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 2041

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840S 274
+15.9%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 237

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840S 3.33
+17.7%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 2.83

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 11288
+43.5%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 7867

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7840S 213
Ryzen 9 5900HS 241
+13.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 1939
+29.5%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 1497

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7840S 6328
+11.9%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 5653

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7840S 64696
+12.9%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 57286

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7840S 296
+7.4%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 276

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.30 13.63
Integrated graphics card 18.33 9.04
Recency 5 January 2023 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 7 7840S has a 12.3% higher aggregate performance score, 102.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen 9 5900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 176 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or Ryzen 9 5900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.