i9-10880H vs Ryzen 7 7840S

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.59
+66%
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.39

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Core i9-10880H by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking452827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Comet Lake
Power efficiency41.3719.38
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MIntel UHD Graphics 630

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.59
+66%
i9-10880H 9.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 24309
+66%
i9-10880H 14642

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7840S 2223
+24.1%
i9-10880H 1791

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840S 274
+28.6%
i9-10880H 213

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.59 9.39
Integrated graphics card 18.29 3.09
Recency 5 January 2023 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840S has a 66% higher aggregate performance score, 491.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10880H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Core i9-10880H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 7 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 vote

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.