Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen 7 7735HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.81
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.62
+5.5%

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking479439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency40.3553.20
Architecture codenameRembrandt-HS Refresh (2023)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date1 April 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$503

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1622
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes208

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 14.81
Ultra 7 155H 15.62
+5.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 23724
Ultra 7 155H 25015
+5.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 6625
Ultra 7 155H 9828
+48.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 40977
Ultra 7 155H 56242
+37.3%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 13372
+2.6%
Ultra 7 155H 13031

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 3.54
+2%
Ultra 7 155H 3.61

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 25
Ultra 7 155H 30
+17.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 2184
Ultra 7 155H 2385
+9.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 248
Ultra 7 155H 255
+2.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 2.94
Ultra 7 155H 3.07
+4.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 12.8
+25%
Ultra 7 155H 10.2

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735HS 125
Ultra 7 155H 128
+2.4%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735HS 270
Ultra 7 155H 296
+9.5%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735HS 6478
Ultra 7 155H 7084
+9.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7735HS 9400
Ultra 7 155H 12184
+29.6%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7735HS 5791
+7.3%
Ultra 7 155H 5398

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7735HS 230
+3.6%
Ultra 7 155H 222

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7735HS 1560
Ultra 7 155H 1764
+13.1%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7735HS 59708
Ultra 7 155H 60595
+1.5%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7735HS 285
+2.3%
Ultra 7 155H 278

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 7735HS 1550
Ultra 7 155H 1687
+8.8%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 7735HS 224
Ultra 7 155H 255
+13.8%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 7735HS 376
Ultra 7 155H 391
+4%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7735HS 10295
Ultra 7 155H 12385
+20.3%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7735HS 2107
Ultra 7 155H 2409
+14.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.81 15.62
Integrated graphics card 14.17 18.52
Recency 1 April 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 22
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 7735HS has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Ultra 7 155H, on the other hand, has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, 30.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 37.5% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735HS and Core Ultra 7 155H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1564 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 609 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735HS or Core Ultra 7 155H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.