Ryzen 5 2500U vs Ryzen 7 7735H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.04
+265%
Ryzen 5 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.12

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by a whopping 265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4671389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency40.6725.99
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H Refresh (2023)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 April 2023 (1 year ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm14 nm
Die size208 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735H 15.04
+265%
Ryzen 5 2500U 4.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7735H 23898
+265%
Ryzen 5 2500U 6543

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7735H 6438
+46%
Ryzen 5 2500U 4411

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 35222
+125%
Ryzen 5 2500U 15684

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 7735H 12924
+168%
Ryzen 5 2500U 4828

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7735H 3.81
+169%
Ryzen 5 2500U 10.23

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 21
+218%
Ryzen 5 2500U 7

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7735H 1825
+200%
Ryzen 5 2500U 609

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 246
+79.6%
Ryzen 5 2500U 137

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 2.91
+83%
Ryzen 5 2500U 1.59

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 10.6
+221%
Ryzen 5 2500U 3.3

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 104
+199%
Ryzen 5 2500U 35

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 252
+108%
Ryzen 5 2500U 121

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 5997
+147%
Ryzen 5 2500U 2426

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7735H 8582
+241%
Ryzen 5 2500U 2515

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7735H 283
Ryzen 5 2500U 771
+172%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7735H 1564
+88.2%
Ryzen 5 2500U 831

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7735H 5621
+63.4%
Ryzen 5 2500U 3441

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7735H 52518
+223%
Ryzen 5 2500U 16251

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7735H 293
+83.1%
Ryzen 5 2500U 160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.04 4.12
Integrated graphics card 15.98 4.50
Recency 1 April 2023 26 October 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 7735H has a 265% higher aggregate performance score, 255.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 2500U, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7735H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2500U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 249 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1128 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735H or Ryzen 5 2500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.