EPYC 9274F vs Ryzen 7 5800H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5800H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 54 Watt
13.22
EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
46.32
+250%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 7 5800H by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking56142
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency23.1713.70
Architecture codenameCezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier3240.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size156 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6SP5
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800H 13.22
EPYC 9274F 46.32
+250%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 5800H 21003
EPYC 9274F 73582
+250%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.22 46.32
Recency 12 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen 7 5800H has 492.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9274F, on the other hand, has a 250.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5800H in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 5800H is a notebook processor while EPYC 9274F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800H and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Ryzen 7 5800H
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4185 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5800H or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.