Xeon Gold 5416S vs Ryzen 7 5700X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5700X
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
17.42
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
23.51
+35%

Xeon Gold 5416S outperforms Ryzen 7 5700X by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking383228
Place by popularity23not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.8064.00
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency24.4414.29
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 April 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299$944

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5416S has 57% better value for money than Ryzen 7 5700X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C79 °C
Number of transistors4,150 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe version4.05
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5700X 17.42
Xeon Gold 5416S 23.51
+35%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 5700X 26658
Xeon Gold 5416S 35976
+35%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.42 23.51
Recency 4 April 2022 10 January 2023
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

Ryzen 7 5700X has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5416S, on the other hand, has a 35% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5416S is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5700X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 5700X is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5416S is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 6889 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5700X or Xeon Gold 5416S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.