i9-14901KE vs Ryzen 7 4700G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 602 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 18.46 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir (2020−2023) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 5.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9800 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 6.15 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 7 4700G has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
i9-14901KE, on the other hand, has 36.7% faster integrated GPU.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4700G and Core i9-14901KE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
