Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs Ryzen 7 3700U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.50
Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
35.99
+700%

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1322101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency28.3921.97
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)no data
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)15 (Pentadeca-Core)
Threads830
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography12 nm22 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C67 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8
SocketFP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1232

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3700U 4.50
Xeon E7-8895 v2 35.99
+700%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 3700U 7141
Xeon E7-8895 v2 57165
+701%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.50 35.99
Recency 6 January 2019 1 January 2014
Physical cores 4 15
Threads 8 30
Chip lithography 12 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 7 3700U has an age advantage of 5 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8895 v2, on the other hand, has a 699.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 275% more physical cores and 275% more threads.

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3700U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 3700U is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-8895 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3700U and Xeon E7-8895 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U
Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1466 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8895 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3700U or Xeon E7-8895 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.