i9-10800F vs Ryzen 7 2700

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.42no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency14.38no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM41200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 30 April 2020
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 7 2700 has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

i9-10800F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700 and Core i9-10800F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i9-10800F
Core i9-10800F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3091 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 11 votes

Rate Core i9-10800F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700 or Core i9-10800F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.