Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen 7 1700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
10.13
Core i7-12700K
2021
12 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
22.38
+121%

i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking726217
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.7658.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)27 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-12700K has 657% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
L1 cache768 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB1 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4Socket V
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700X 10.13
i7-12700K 22.38
+121%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1700X 15674
i7-12700K 34619
+121%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 121% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Ryzen 7 1700X 1090
i7-12700K 2532
+132%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 132% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Ryzen 7 1700X 5594
i7-12700K 13664
+144%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 144% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700X 4662
i7-12700K 9305
+99.6%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 100% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700X 31950
i7-12700K 63484
+98.7%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 99% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 1700X 9076
i7-12700K 16827
+85.4%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 85% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 7 1700X 4.89
i7-12700K 2.66
+83.8%

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i7-12700K by 84% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 1700X 17
i7-12700K 38
+126%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 126% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 1700X 1537
i7-12700K 3325
+116%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 116% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 1700X 154
i7-12700K 272
+76.6%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 77% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 7 1700X 1.73
i7-12700K 3.29
+90.2%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 90% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 7 1700X 9
i7-12700K 15.7
+75.4%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 75% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 7 1700X 3728
i7-12700K 10389
+179%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 179% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 7 1700X 90
i7-12700K 179
+98.8%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 99% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 7 1700X 180
i7-12700K 350
+94.2%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by 94% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.13 22.38
Recency 22 February 2017 27 October 2021
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700X has 31.6% lower power consumption.

i7-12700K, on the other hand, has a 120.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-12700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 1700X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-12700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 712 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1705 votes

Rate Core i7-12700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700X or Core i7-12700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.