Athlon II X3 445 vs Ryzen 7 1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.50
+712%
Athlon II X3 445
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.17

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Athlon II X3 445 by a whopping 712% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8162371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.912.01
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency13.591.14
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Rana (2009−2011)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$91

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 95% better value for money than Athlon II X3 445.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads163
Base clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache768 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA3-
AVX+-
SenseMI+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.50
+712%
Athlon II X3 445 1.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14816
+713%
Athlon II X3 445 1823

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 1700 1027
+251%
Athlon II X3 445 293

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 1700 5218
+717%
Athlon II X3 445 639

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.50 1.17
Recency 22 February 2017 11 May 2010
Physical cores 8 3
Threads 16 3
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has a 712% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X3 445 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Athlon II X3 445, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD Athlon II X3 445
Athlon II X3 445

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1522 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 204 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or Athlon II X3 445, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.