Ryzen 5 7520U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
7.96
+37.7%
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.78

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9381118
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency50.2236.47
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size156 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 7.96
+37.7%
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12639
+37.6%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9188

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1312
+10.3%
Ryzen 5 7520U 1189

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4586
+22%
Ryzen 5 7520U 3759

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1161
+39.2%
Ryzen 5 7520U 834

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 175
+3.7%
Ryzen 5 7520U 169

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4649
+21.7%
Ryzen 5 7520U 3821

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 429
Ryzen 5 7520U 588
+37.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1071
+0.5%
Ryzen 5 7520U 1066

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4223
+1.3%
Ryzen 5 7520U 4167

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 31980
+32%
Ryzen 5 7520U 24219

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 186
Ryzen 5 7520U 191
+2.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.96 5.78
Integrated graphics card 6.04 2.85
Recency 7 May 2020 20 September 2022
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has a 37.7% higher aggregate performance score, 111.9% faster integrated GPU, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 229 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1420 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.