Ryzen 3 7320U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.72
+3.1%
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.55

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G outperforms Ryzen 3 7320U by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11391157
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency8.3234.99
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 5.72
+3.1%
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 9085
+3%
Ryzen 3 7320U 8817

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.72 5.55
Integrated graphics card 5.48 2.85
Recency 30 September 2019 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 92.3% faster integrated GPU.

Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7320U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 108 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 732 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.