Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G outperforms Phenom II X6 1100T BE by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Phenom II X6 1100T BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1112 | 1496 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | no data | 2.74 |
Architecture codename | no data | Thuban (2010) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Phenom II X6 1100T BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 6 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4096 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | no data | 346 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 904 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Phenom II X6 1100T BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Phenom II X6 1100T BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 5.83 | 3.62 |
Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
Threads | 8 | 6 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more threads, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores.
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1100T BE in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1100T BE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G and Phenom II X6 1100T BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.