EPYC 9845 vs Ryzen 5 7640HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.59
EPYC 9845
2024
160 cores / 320 threads, 390 Watt
87.95
+503%

EPYC 9845 outperforms Ryzen 5 7640HS by a whopping 503% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.56
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency39.4521.34
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Turin (2024)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)160
Threads12320
Base clock speed4.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP8SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.59
EPYC 9845 87.95
+503%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7640HS 23169
EPYC 9845 139712
+503%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.59 87.95
Physical cores 6 160
Threads 12 320
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 390 Watt

Ryzen 5 7640HS has 1014.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has a 502.8% higher aggregate performance score, 2566.7% more physical cores and 2566.7% more threads, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9845 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7640HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 7640HS is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7640HS and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 507 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7640HS or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.