Embedded G-Series T48E vs Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 410 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 39.63 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Embedded G-Series |
| Power efficiency | 23.56 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | Bobcat |
| Release date | 30 August 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 14 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 11,270 million | 451 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 8.53 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6250 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.98 | 0.24 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 18 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7600X3D has 725% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
Embedded G-Series T48E, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 7600X3D is a desktop processor while Embedded G-Series T48E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Embedded G-Series T48E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
