Ryzen 7 8840U vs Ryzen 5 7600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7600
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.06
+13.4%
Ryzen 7 8840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.04

Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking380472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency24.8450.83
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date14 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size71 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475VRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7600 17.06
+13.4%
Ryzen 7 8840U 15.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7600 27100
+13.5%
Ryzen 7 8840U 23884

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 7600 2747
+24.2%
Ryzen 7 8840U 2212

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 7600 12226
+30.1%
Ryzen 7 8840U 9398

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 7600 8122
+10%
Ryzen 7 8840U 7381

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 7600 46166
+11.8%
Ryzen 7 8840U 41306

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 5 7600 15993
+12.3%
Ryzen 7 8840U 14245

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 5 7600 3.06
+7.2%
Ryzen 7 8840U 3.28

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 5 7600 26
+9.7%
Ryzen 7 8840U 24

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 7600 2339
+31.3%
Ryzen 7 8840U 1782

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 7600 298
+12.2%
Ryzen 7 8840U 266

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 7600 3.51
+9%
Ryzen 7 8840U 3.22

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 5 7600 12.5
+8.7%
Ryzen 7 8840U 11.5

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 5 7600 138
+16.1%
Ryzen 7 8840U 119

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 5 7600 347
+30%
Ryzen 7 8840U 267

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 7600 11095
+15.1%
Ryzen 7 8840U 9636

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 7600 219
Ryzen 7 8840U 283
+29.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 7600 2088
+11.1%
Ryzen 7 8840U 1879

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 7600 7566
+26.3%
Ryzen 7 8840U 5993

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 7600 64613
+19.6%
Ryzen 7 8840U 54009

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 7600 345
+14.2%
Ryzen 7 8840U 302

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 5 7600 352
Ryzen 7 8840U 413
+17.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.06 15.04
Integrated graphics card 4.43 18.32
Recency 14 January 2023 6 December 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 7600 has a 13.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 8840U, on the other hand, has 313.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8840U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 7600 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 8840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1272 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 175 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7600 or Ryzen 7 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.