Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U vs Ryzen 5 7535U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7535U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
10.71
+13.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
9.42

Ryzen 5 7535U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking731811
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency36.2059.43
Architecture codenameRembrandt-R (2023)Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.55 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die size208 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP6
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7535U 10.71
+13.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U 9.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7535U 17011
+13.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U 14970

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 7535U 1752
+2.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U 1716

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 7535U 6602
+12.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U 5884

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 7535U 6919
+24.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U 5548

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.71 9.42
Integrated graphics card 16.31 7.47
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7535U has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score, 118.3% faster integrated GPU, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7535U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7535U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
Ryzen 5 7535U
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 79 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7535U or Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.