Celeron M 530 vs Ryzen 5 7235HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7235HS outperforms Celeron M 530 by a whopping 3650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1018 | 3290 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 15.87 | 0.63 |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-R (2023) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.95V-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP7 | PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 660M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7235HS and Celeron M 530.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.50 | 0.20 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 30 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7235HS has a 3650% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 530, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 7235HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 530 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
