Celeron E3300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 5600X3D outperforms Celeron E3300 by a whopping 2634% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 543 | 2901 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 42.16 | 0.83 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 12.41 | 0.73 |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2024) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 7 July 2023 (1 year ago) | 30 August 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $70 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 5600X3D has 4980% better value for money than Celeron E3300.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.67 | 0.50 |
| Recency | 7 July 2023 | 30 August 2009 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 5 5600X3D has a 2634% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron E3300, on the other hand, has 61.5% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 5600X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 5600X3D and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
