Athlon MP 2100+ vs Ryzen 5 5500GT
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 598 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 66.00 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon MP |
| Power efficiency | 18.55 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 19 June 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | $262 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 128 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 66 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 19 June 2002 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 66 Watt |
Ryzen 5 5500GT has an age advantage of 21 year, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 5500GT is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2100+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon MP 2100+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
