Ryzen 5 9600X vs Ryzen 5 3600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
Ryzen 5 9600X
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
18.95
+69.7%

Ryzen 5 9600X outperforms Ryzen 5 3600 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking702314
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.8151.85
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency16.2627.59
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 9600X has 127% better value for money than Ryzen 5 3600.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
Ryzen 5 9600X 18.95
+69.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600 17742
Ryzen 5 9600X 30105
+69.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 3600 1568
Ryzen 5 9600X 2630
+67.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 3600 192
Ryzen 5 9600X 341
+77.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.17 18.95
Recency 7 July 2019 8 August 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

Ryzen 5 9600X has a 69.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 9600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 9600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
Ryzen 5 9600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17583 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 192 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 9600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 5 9600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.