Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 vs Ryzen 5 3500X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500X
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.28
+44.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.73

Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9071126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency12.068.34
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date24 September 2019 (5 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500X 8.28
+44.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 5.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500X 13160
+44.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 9099

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3500X 1580
+37.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 1146

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3500X 5936
+60.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 3696

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.28 5.73
Recency 24 September 2019 29 June 2017
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 5 3500X has a 44.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 3500X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500X and Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1799 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500X or Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.